Session 3: Hall: Bleep Test: 20th Nov

This time of year the athletes are required to perform a bleep test to see how they have improved since the last time. This will be used as a starting point to produce a full needs analysis and scheme of work.

What is a Bleep Test?

The multi-stage fitness test, also known as the bleep test, pacer test, Leger-test or 20-m shuttle run test

The Stages involved

(Léger et al.,1988).

Rules

The test involves running continuously between two points that are 20 m apart from side to side. These runs are synchronized with a pre-recorded audio tape, CD or laptop software, which plays beeps at set intervals. As the test proceeds, the interval between each successive beep reduces, forcing the athlete to increase their speed over the course of the test, until it is impossible to keep in sync with the recording (or, in rare occasions, if the athlete completes the test). Many people who test people using the Multi-stage fitness test allow one level to beep before the person makes the line, but if the person being tested does not make the next interval then the most recent level they completed is their final score. The recording is typically structured into 21 ‘levels’, each of which lasts around 62 seconds. Usually, the interval of beeps is calculated as requiring a speed at the start of 8.5 km/h, increasing by 0.5 km/h with each level thereafter. The progression from one level to the next is signaled by 3 quick beeps. The highest level attained before failing to keep up is recorded as the score for that test.

 

Reference

Léger, L.A.; Mercier, D.; Gadoury, C.; Lambert, J. (1988). “The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness”. J Sports Sci 6 (2): 93–101

session 2: Road Run: Fartlek-Reflection

15th Novenber session was a road run orientated fartlek session.

This comprised of a 10 min warm up game and a 45-50 min session.

The warm was changed from the usual one. I decided to use a games aprroach to warm up the athletes and “rise their motivation levels” in this cold time.

The game comprised of tig, however the athlete who got tug must perform a dynamic stretch then can rejoin the game. the tigger remains the tigger for 2min then the last person they tig becomes the new tigger.

After 6min I noticed that they were all having fun, however not all were doing the dynamic stretches. Thus I ended the game and explained that we needed to do more dynamic stretches with probing questions. This provided useful as they were aware of why we did them and they now all now what a dynamic stretch is.

For the last 2min of the warmup they performed dynamic stretches focusing on their legs and shoulders, ready for the run.

A brief drink break was introduced while giving information on  the upcoming cross country event and LWAC nominations.

Main session:

The athletes were asked if they wanted to road run or stay on the track. The athletes that stayed on the track did pyramids 50×3-70×2-90-120-90-70×2-50×3, with Linda Ellis Head Coach.

The athletes that went one road run, with Mark Thornton Level 3 Coach and myself, did Jog and walk efforts. This is an intorductory aerobic Fartlek session. This involved jogging for 10 min and walking for a min or 2 depending on how the athletes felt with the pace.

The route involved going down hills to work on their deceleration control and uphill to focus on thier power and stregth development.

I was aware that some athletes are more areobically tuned than others and the pace had to be adjusted to adapt for all athletes. The athletes that were not challenged on the road were asked byself how they were pyhsically feeling and if they were fine, which they were, they were asked to join me for one lap around the cycle track of 1000m.

This insured them that they were gaining more from the session and that if they stay at this level they will be moved up to the more advanced runners in the spring/summer time, Dave Humberstones Middle distance Group

Future Coaching Points:

During Warm ups ensure more praise is given and more encouragement to positive behaviour

When bad behaviour is shown, have more understanding on how to solve the problem.

This will be shown with further research in the management section

Session 1: Anaerobic: Fartlek – Reflection

After a conversation with the head, it was concluded that the planned session was not approprite as they had a competition on Saturday 10th. Thus the session got changed to 6 x 150m instead of the fartlek session planned.

However it is agreed that the fartlek session can be done on Thursday 15th (tommorrow). Thus session 2 will now be the fartlek session. Also due to having the hall available next week, tuesday; a bleep test (Multi Stage Fitness Test) will be put in place.

Coaching:

Overall I enganged with the athletes during the whole session and promoted a positive attitude towards individual achievements. I created a fun atmosphere by asking the athletes which dynamic exercises they wished to do, for instance (Wheel Barrow). This is great as it enables the athletes to use their arms and core to achieve balance. Not all achieved this, so it will continue to the next session.

During the 150m all athletes participated and represented near pefect technique. This was pointed out to them and to celebrate we had a game of bulldog (positive behaviour management).

At the end of the session I asked them what aspects they enjoyed and which ones they didn’t. This will be reflected in the next session on Thursday.

Injuries:

Two participants had an injury from last week, which was noted. They were infromed if they feel any pain to stop and inform us to prevent further injury.

Weaknesses:

I noticed I didnt involve the assistant coach much, thus next session i will brief them on what the session will entail and ask for the to take an active part.

 

Session 1: Anaerobic: Fartlek

Todays Session at 6:30pm-7:30pm will focus on fartlek training. Fartlek is swedish  for speed play. It consists of interval training and continous training (McArdle et al., 2009).

The session will consist of a dynamic warm up (10min), Fartlek session (3x10min with 2min recovery), then will consist of a game of the athletes choice for the last 10min.

Click here for Dynamic Warm Up.

This will be updated after the session for the reflection process to begin and to begin scheme of work for the following sessions to come.

Positive Behaviour Introduction

Every group develops different dynamics and every participant is a unique individual (Sport Coach UK, 2012). This provides the coach with a challenge of getting to know thier group and individuals character. The behavioural approach to coaching best decribes actions that assist and solve bad behaviour from occuring, such as a child always chatting while instructions are given to the group.

Why Positive Sport Coaching

This video provides valid reasons why yelling at athletes isnt a good thing, it does n’t reinforce good practice. The organisation offers coaching workshops to make coaches/parent more aware of this.

Upcoming

Further details will be listed in my next post under the managements tab and will incorparate planning for sessions to prove solutions to potential beahavioural issues that could occur.
 

Paperwork and Group Observation

In order to begin my coaching placement with the youth athletes group based at Lincoln Welington athletics club, I have given the supervisor: Linda the supervisor paper work. Once recieved back it will be visable in the appendix: supervisor appraisal or click here.

I have been observing the group and, with colaberation with the lead coach, have come to the conclusion that the majority of the group need to focus on fundementals and aerobic fitness. From this the needs anaylsis will be produced.

With further communication with Linda (Lead Coach) the scheme of work will be written and will be seen in more depth on the session reflections.

Session Template

A session plan is the notes used by the coach during training. The session plan includes all of the information needed by the trainer including content, resources and timing.

The content should be organised so that it gives the training session structure and to ensure information is covered in a way that helps trainees to learn.

For an example of a completed session plan refer to session_plan_example.

To write a session plan you need to know the learning outcome for the Long term goals. If you don’t have a learning outcome you will need to write one first.

This process enables the coaching cycle:

 

Coaching Philosophy

It is important to determine what your coaching philosophy and coaching style is. Although coaching style varies from situation to situation it is im,portant to establish which one best suits you and your athlete. For instances the uka coaching resources suggests that the optimal coaching style should be an athlete centred approach.

However for a better understanding on coaching philosophy, please see the below clip.

Seeding

Seeding is the term used by sociologists to describe the hypodermic syringe model. thought by one embedded into others. this process is also evident in coaching. As coaches we part knowledge to our athletes in order to develop and progress their individual.group performances. This also relates to the Ltad model of coaching.

Our ideas are comunnicatced in verbal and non verbal methods. In coaching this could be a demonstation of a movement or the explination. For example see Mike Powell’s Coaching the long jump video.

This enables the athlete to experience both verbal and non verbal communication, thus expanding their knowledege. The coach has successfully put their ideas accross to the athlete. However in order to do this effectivly, the coach has to engange with the athlete.